top of page
Search
Writer's pictureLegal Insight

Regulation of Fake News in India

Regulation of Fake News in India




Fake news has become very popular lately, and as such has been characterized, named, and arranged in an assortment of ways. This research paper presents the term fake news beginning with the overall discernments individuals have about fake news. A significant number of the examples introduced here will help to understand that the modern procedures of faking news. The paper will introduce the various sorts of news that have been marked as fake news and how they vary from one another.

While political entertainers have most likely consistently misrepresented, deluded or now and again even lied, it appears to be both the recurrence of falsehoods and their centrality in the methodology of some political entertainers have expanded lately.

There are instruments such as statutory provisions as well as some organizations which work towards controlling the spread of fake news. This article further talks about these instruments in detail. There is no particular principle for managing counterfeit news in India and because of it individuals spread counterfeit data for self-centeredness and free distribution or broadcast of information in India streams from the major right to opportunity of articulation as revered under Article 19 of the Constitution. So fake news influences free speech regarding the subjects of the nation, prompting the seizing of democracy. Fake news is mainly created for earning benefits by misleading the audience by creating it in a way that attracts the public.

At last, a course of events of fake news is introduced for readers to value how this news advanced through a heap of structures; informal, printed material, radio, TV and film, and social media or digital media and it expects to give a depiction of key and huge purposes of references where fake news has an effect in social media period.


The term “fake news” is different for different people but mainly fake news means the news or hoaxes that are deliberately made for misinforming or deceiving the readers. Once in a while, this news might be promulgated with a deliberate intention to mislead the reader or might be planned as "misleading content" composed for economic incentives as the news writers get profits when people click on their news. Lately, fake news has multiplied using web-based media, partially because they are so effectively and immediately shared on the internet.

For the most part, these accounts are made to either impact individuals’ perspectives, push a political plan or create turmoil and can frequently be a productive business for online distributors.

As Supervisor of Postcard News (India) was arrested for spreading fake news pointed toward making collective dissension. Russia has been accused of controlling the 2016 US decisions through bots and phoney news; it is a worldwide famous case of international online manipulation. Russian impedance in elections in the US and West Europe has been the greatest content manipulation concern lately. Facebook in the light of the mounting analysis in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica information scandal has declared that it will fight fake news and political deception, with new controls planned to guarantee genuineness and straightforwardness among sponsors and publishers. In Mexico also, an expected 75,000 automated accounts referred to conversationally as Peñabots have been utilized to overpower political opposition on Twitter. Counterfeit News is overpowering and confusing the genuine truth. Also, in the recent Karnataka Assembly elections (2018) fake news about opponent parties and applicants overwhelmed the media.

Fundamentally, this chapter presents a detailed overview with different examples to help readers better recognize and understand fake news.

Fake news has existed since the beginning of the printing press however in the times of the internet and digital media, it has discovered an immense application. Control of calculations of digital media and search engines to reach enormous crowds and misdirect news buyers is a worldwide pattern now. Fake video clips and reports with transformed media logos, bots, and paid commentators for favourable online standing have gotten normal. Fake news circulates daily by different sources mainly by technical platforms like Whatsapp, Facebook, Google, Twitter etc. as in the age of the web it is a major issue as rumours, transformed pictures, misleading content sources, unverified news, unsubstantiated data, planted stories for different interests spread effectively among 35 crore internet users in India. There have been numerous occasions of online rumours resulting in the killings of honest individuals. Sometimes, ministers have erased tweets after understanding the fake news which they shared before. In India, WhatsApp is the most vulnerable platform to fake news. A large number of Indians utilizing the internet honestly by sending 'good morning' messages each day are viewed as generally vulnerable to fake news. In a report of The Times of India, it was stated that more than 200 cases were filed related to fake news only in 5 months in 2020 as the previous year was a pandemic year and that’s why many people tried to earn money by misleading the audience by providing them fake information related to Coronavirus.

There is a case that will help the readers to relate the topic with reality. The case is “Anheuser Busch LIc vs Rishav Sharma & Ors[1]”, this case is submitted by Mr Praveen Anand, learned counsel for the offended party that this case has been organized against three respondents. These three unknown owners of the site www.thefauxy.com ensure the protection of intellectual rights and the reputation of the offended party. As indicated by Mr Anand, the trademark of the plaintiff has encroached and its reputation discolored by the defendants’ posts on social media including Twitter and YouTube which execute news expressing that the employees of the plaintiff have been peeing in the beer i.e. ‘Budweiser’ offered to its clients. But later it was found that the news was fake and it was made just to mislead the audience. And this resulted in a huge fine over defendants.

Also, in the case “Alakh Alok Srivastava vs Union of India[2]”, in the instant writ petitions, we are worried about the migrant workers who have begun leaving their workplaces for their home towns/towns situated at far off spots. For instance, thousands of workers left Delhi to arrive at their homes in the states i.e., Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, by walking on the highways. We are educated that the workers who are jobless because of lockdown were worried about their survival. Panic was created by some fake news that the lockdown would keep going for over more than three months. The Solicitor General of India has likewise referred to the Status Report to submit that the departure of migrant workers was set off because of panic created by some fake and misleading news and online media.

This chapter tries to explain with the help of cases that how this fake news gets circulating more and more and misleads the audience.


Fake news is due to many reasons like earning profits, political gains, goodwill gains and many other reasons and people makes this fake news in a manner that attracts a large audience. There are so many causes of fake news like printing press, social media (Whatsapp, Facebook, Twitter etc.) As there are so many causes of these fakes news likewise there are so many effects of them as they create panic in the society, gives rise to riots, misleads health and sometimes even take the lives of innocents.

There are some popular incidences relating to fake news in India:

· President Kovind makes Twitter debut and gain about 3 million followers in one single hour.

· There was news in 2016 that there will be a shortage of salt and this resulted in an increase in demands for salt which increased in price of salt.

· There was also another news in November 2016 only that there is a nanochip in 2000 Rupee note which can trace location.

· Child kidnapping rumors in Jharkhand leads to mob lynchings.

· News by Aaj Tak that there is a law named Fatwa in Saudi Arabia in which men can eat wives when hungry.

· There was also fake news about the college student that a JNU student named Najeeb Ahmed has joined ISIS after missing for some days.

· Recently in 2020 also some videos of Muslims were circulated in which they were cleaning dishes by licking them and some news channels stated that they were spreading the Coronavirus by doing this but later it came to know that those videos were of 2018 and the earlier news was fake.

Generally, this chapter tries to explain the causes and effects of different fake news with the help of different examples.

Fake news spread in media is turning into a genuine social challenge. It is prompting the toxic environment on the internet and causing riots and lynchings here and there. As we know in the period of WhatsApp, Facebook and Twitter it is a major issue as rumors because fake news spreads so rapidly among large audiences due to it. There are about 35 crore internet users in India and among them, there are so many uneducated and also there are some who behave like uneducated by just forwarding anything without even verifying it on the official site and because of them, it has become a major problem. Fake news can be controlled by some Organizations, Acts, or Sections.

· The Fake News (Prohibition) Act, 2019 – The Parliament of India recently passed a bill in 2019 related to fake news which forbids the creation and circulation of fake news in media and for matters linked therewith.

· Press Council of India, an administrative body, can caution, advise or rebuke the newspaper, the news organization, the editor or the journalist or oppose the lead of the editor or the journalist on the off chance that it finds that a paper or a news office has abused editorial morals.

· News Broadcasters Association (NBA) shows the private TV news and current affairs, telecasters. The self-administrative body tests objections against electronic media.

· Indian Broadcast Foundation (IBF) likewise investigates the grievances against substances broadcasted by channels.

· Broadcasting Content Complaint Council (BCCC) acknowledges grievances against TV telecasters for objectionable TV substance and fake news.

· Indian Penal Code (IPC) has certain sections which could curb fake news: Sections 153 and 295 can be invoked to guard against fake news.

· The Information Technology Act, 2000 also has some sections which deal with the fake news, as section 66 of this Act states that if any individual, dishonestly or fraudulently, does any act alluded to in segment 43 then he will be punishable with detainment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine which may reach out to five lakh rupees or with both.

· Civil or Criminal Case for Defamation is another option against fake news for people who are hurt by the fake news. IPC Section 499 and 500 provides the power to the plaintiff to file a case for defamation under these sections.

The government of India also amended the ‘Guidelines for Accreditation of Journalists’ on 2nd April 2018 to curb fake news across the media by giving cancellation of accreditations of journalists even before the completion of the proposed 15 days inquiry.

This chapter defines various Acts, Sections and Organization which manipulates fake news.

Fake news is regularly made and regulated for acquiring money and political gains. Regularly government’s own party and organizations might be included in this system. It is a rising pattern seen in numerous nations driven by China and Russia where network control is very high.

Any future legislation to control fake news should consider the entire picture in account and not accuse the media as in this time of new media anybody can make and circulate the fake news for undisclosed advantages. Controlling fake news is a hectic issue and not controlling it could lead to national and international insecurity while doing an excessive amount to control it could hurt democracy. Since the advent of the printing press, fake news has found a huge application in the era of the internet and social media. The abuse of social media and search engine algorithms is now a worldwide practice to target broad markets and deceive news customers. It has become very popular to mislead the audience by providing them fabricated video clips, news reports with morphed media icons and other things. In this age of digital media, for unknown gains, everyone can develop and distribute fake news and for their part, law enforcement agencies ought to take strict actions against those who share such fake material. Countering content manipulation and fake news to reestablish confidence in online media without undermining internet and media opportunity will require public education, strengthening of guidelines and efforts of tech organizations to make appropriate algorithms for news curation. Italy, for instance, has tentatively added recognizing fake news in the school syllabus. India ought to likewise truly emphasize online protection, internet education, and fake news education in the scholarly educational program at all levels.



Name: Sanket Dhull

College: Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad

Year of Study: II Year

[1] Anheuser Busch LIc v. Rishav Sharma & Ors, CS (COMM) 288/2020. [2] Alakh Alok Srivastava v. Union of India, (2018) 5 SCC 651.

37 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page