top of page
Search
Writer's pictureLegal Insight

IPC General Defence sec - (76-95)

SEC- 76-;

Mistake-

1. Mistake of fact ( Ignorentia Facts Excuse )

2. Mistake of Law ( Ignorentia Juris non-excuse)


A mistake should be by ignorance

section 76


Bound by law act done by a person bound or by mistake of fact believing himself bound by law. -


Section 77

Act of a judge when acting judicially - Nothing is an offense which is done by a judge when acting judicially in the exercise of any power or which is in good faith, he believed to be given to him by law.


section 78

Act done by a person or by the mistake of fact believing himself justified by law - Nothing is an offense which is done by any person who is justified by law or who by reason mistake of fact and not by the reason of his mistake of law, believed himself to be justified by law, in doing it


Dakhi Singh v/s state of Delhi AIR 1955 Allahabad High Court 39

in this case the police officer in order to effect the arrest you are thief he fired in short an innocent person that person died on a spot court held that section 79 is not a defense in a case of theft it could be justified by the law if there was a murderer or some serious accused but in this case, it is not a defenses


Section 79

Act done by a person justified or by mistake of fact believing himself justified by law -


Nothing is an offence which is done by any person who is justified by law or who by reason of a mistake of fact not by reason of a mistake of law believing himself in a good faith and justified by Law, doing it.

This action define that nothing is an offence which is done by a judge or acting judicially while exercising the legal powers and believing yourself in a good faith while giving a judgment however if a judge has acted ultra-virus or beyond its capacity and office acted as per direction or discretion, then also the officer will be protected if he acted in a good faith

section 80 - Accident

Ingredients


  • The criminal intention

  • The act was done in a lawful manner

  • proper caution and lawful manner


in a case of Sukhadev Singh

v/s

Delhi administration AIR2003 SC3716

The Supreme Court held that sec. 80 exempt that innocent person when act has been done in lawful manner by lawful means without criminal intention or knowledge.

Under section 18 willing full and negligent act cannot be taken as a accident


12 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

PIL: Public Interest Litigation

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is a type of litigation which is to safeguard the interest of public and determines the availability of jus

Comments


bottom of page